Rogers v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20193:19-cv-01978California4,640 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BRIAN F. ROGERS, Case No. 19-cv-01978-SI

10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 11 v. MOTION FOR A VEXATIOUS

LITIGANT ORDER

12 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: Dkt. No. 21 13 Defendant. 14 15 Now before the Court is defendant’s motion for an order declaring plaintiff a vexatious 16 litigant (“Motion”). This motion is scheduled for hearing on November 26, 2019. Pursuant to Civil 17 Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and 18 hereby VACATES the hearing. Having considered the papers submitted and for good cause shown, 19 defendant’s motion is DENIED. Additionally, the Court GRANTS defendant’s request and 20 supplemental request for judicial notice in their entirety. 21 22 BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff Brian F. Rogers is no stranger to litigation. The San Diego County Superior Court 24 has already found plaintiff to be a vexatious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.