Ser Lao v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20195:16-cv-00333California2,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SER LAO,

Case No. 5:16-cv-00333-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING CROSS MOTION FOR

H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

8 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 112, 113

This matter is a wage and hour class action against the clothing retailer H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. (“H&M”) wherein Plaintiff, a former employee of H&M, contends that H&M violated various state laws by (1) requiring employees to undergo an off-the-clock security check before leaving their stores and (2) paying final wages to separated employees with Money Network ATM cards without first obtaining the employees’ consent. Plaintiff’s claims are based on California law. Both parties have moved for partial summary judgment on liability over the security check policy. Plaintiff’s second and third causes of action are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.