Pearce

Avaya Inc. v. Pearce

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20193:19-cv-00565California6,891 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

BACKGROUND

19

I. The Parties

20 Plaintiff Avaya, Inc. (“Avaya”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business 21 located in Santa Clara, California. First Amend. Compl. ¶ 6 (“FAC”) (Dkt. No. 59). Avaya provides 22 23 1 In April and May of 2019, Hines, DBSI, and US Voice filed motions to dismiss for lack 24 of personal jurisdiction. In an order filed July 9, 2019, the Court deferred ruling on the motions to dismiss to allow Avaya to conduct jurisdictional discovery. 25 Plaintiff and defendants seek to file under seal portions of the supplemental briefing and exhibits. The material at issue was designated as confidential by defendants. Although defendants 26 did not file a declaration in support of plaintiff’s administrative motion to seal (as is required by Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1) and this Court’s October 15, 2019 order, Dkt. No. 132), defendants did 27 file a declaration in support of their administrative motion to seal. Because the material at issue is 1 hardware, software, and communication solutions to companies ranging from small businesses to 2 government organizations. Id. ¶ 21. According to the FAC, “Avaya sells its products and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.