Howard

Howard v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20193:18-cv-02570California3,051 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WYNETTE HOWARD, Case No. 3:18-cv-02570-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 17 10

ANDREW SAUL,1

Defendant. 11

12 13 Plaintiff Howard challenges the decision of a Social Security Administration (“SSA”) 14 administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denying her claims for Social Security disability insurance 15 (“SSDI”) under Title II, and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI, of the Social 16 Security Act. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 14, 17. Howard 17 also filed a reply brief in opposition to defendant’s cross-motion and in support of her motion for 18 summary judgment. Dkt. No. 20. Howard’s motion is granted in part, and denied in part. 19 Defendant Saul’s motion is also granted in part, and denied in part. The case is remanded to the 20 ALJ for the calculation and award of benefits. 21 BACKGROUND 22 On February 11, 1999, Howard suffered a ruptured brain aneurysm, subarachnoid 23 hemorrhage…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.