Vigdorchik

Vigdorchik v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20194:19-cv-03891California941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NATALYA VIGDORCHIK, Case No. 19-cv-03891-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY v. Re: Dkt. No.

LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Natalya Vigdorchik filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) against Defendants Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty Life”) and the Wells Fargo & Company Long-Term Disability Plan (“the Plan”). Dkt. No. 1. The parties agree that the Court should apply the de novo standard of review to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to benefits under the Plan, but disagree as to whether the Court should permit discovery. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks discovery “into the credibility, objectivity and independence of experts retained by Defendant Liberty Life.” Dkt. No. 18 at 1. Because Plaintiff has not established that the circumstances in this case “clearly establish that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.