Torres

Torres v. Pompeo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20193:19-cv-04752California528 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARMANDO TORRES, Case No. 19-cv-04752-JCS

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO FILE EXHIBITS IN THE

9 v. PUBLIC RECORD

10 MICHAEL R. POMPEO, Defendant. 11

12 Plaintiff Armando Torres filed his complaint and several attached exhibits on August 14, 13 2019. Because some (but not all) of the exhibits contained personal information, the Clerk 14 provisionally sealed the exhibits as a courtesy, pending Torres’s filing of an administrative motion 15 to maintain sensitive information under seal. Torres’s counsel thereafter filed a perfunctory 16 motion to seal, but neither specified particular sensitive information to maintain under seal, nor 17 provided any meaningful argument that compelling reasons warranted sealing, as is required to 18 overcome the presumption of public access to judicial proceedings. See Admin. Mot. for Leave to 19 E-File Under Seal (dkt. 4); Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096–97 20 (9th Cir. 2016); Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.