Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Cytek Biosciences Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BECTON, DICKINSON AND Case No. 18-cv-00933-MMC
COMPANY,
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS v. Re: Dkt. No. 139 CYTEK BIOSCIENCES INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is plaintiff/counterdefendant Becton, Dickinson and Company’s (“BD”) motion, filed September 5, 2019, to strike and/or dismiss the first and second causes of action asserted against it in defendant/counterclaimant Cytek Biosciences, Inc.’s (“Cytek”) Second Amended Counterclaims (“SACC”). Cytek has filed opposition, to which BD has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Becton is a “medical technology company” that “manufactures and sells a broad range of medical supplies, devices, laboratory equipment, and diagnostic products” (see Compl. ¶ 8), including flow…