Aguilera

Aguilera v. Ducart

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20194:18-cv-03389California1,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANGEL AGUILERA, Case No. 18-cv-03389-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT;

v. RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C. E. DUCART, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) has filed a pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 3, 2019, the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the excessive force claims against Defendants Molina, Hendrix, Gonzalez, and Vicks, but granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Ducart. Dkt. No. 37. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his claim against Defendant Ducart. Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. No. 38) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.