Parks

Parks v. Peterson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20193:12-cv-01352California660 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 In Re Case No. 12-cv-01352-EMC Case No. 12-cv-05094-EMC 8 STEVEN DEAN PARKS, Case No. 12-cv-06018-EMC 9 Plaintiff. Case No. 12-cv-06140-EMC Case No. 13-cv-02489-EMC 10 Case No. 13-cv-04048-EMC Case No. 13-cv-05215-EMC 11

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

12 VACATE FILING FEE OBLIGATIONS 13

14 Steven Dean Parks, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, filed the seven listed civil cases 15 and applied in each to proceed in forma pauperis. His in forma pauperis applications were 16 granted several years ago, and he was put on the payment schedule required by 28 U.S.C. § 17 1915(b). One of the features of the payment schedule is that the prisoner is “required to make 18 monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s 19 account.” Id. at § 1915(b)(2). The cases have long been closed, but the filing fee obligations live 20 on. 21 Mr. Parks now moves to vacate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.