Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20194:19-cv-05924California867 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 OMNI MEDSCI, INC., Case No.: 19-cv-05924-YGR

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,

ORDER DENYING APPLE INC.’S REQUEST

v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION REGARDING

SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION 12 A

PPLE INC.,

Defendant/Counter Claimant. Re: Dkt. No. 327 13 14 Now before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) request for leave to file a motion for reconsideration under Civil Local Rule 7-9(a). (Dkt. No. 327.) The present case was transferred from the Eastern District of Texas on October 2, 2019. Prior to transfer, the Texas Court denied Apple’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on plaintiff’s alleged lack of ownership of the asserted patents. (Dkt. No. 276.) Apple now seeks reconsideration of the transferor court’s denial. Having carefully considered the papers in support and in opposition, and the authority on which they are based, the Court DENIES the motion for leave. Civil Local Rule 7-9(a) requires that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.