Frost

Frost v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20193:19-cv-05365California680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINTON FROST, Case No. 19-cv-05365-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE COMPLAINT, IFP

v. APPLICATION AND CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 6 Defendant.

12 Pro se plaintiff Vinton Frost filed an initial and amended complaint alleging that the United States Department of Justice and the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California improperly withheld and misclassified documents in response to FOIA requests. Dkt. No. 6. Frost also applied to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) for this lawsuit. Dkt. No. 3. Frost is a frequent pro se litigant in our district. His recent actions include Frost v. Steyer, 16-cv-05883-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2016); Frost v. Pinkus, 17-cv-01308-WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2017); Frost v. Wilkinson, 17-cv-01587-LB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2017); Frost v. United States Department of Justice, 17-cv-01240-JCS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2017); and Frost v. Texas Pacific Group,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.