Downey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK DOWNEY, Case No. 19-cv-03717-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 On September 23, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 13 and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 9. The Court directed Plaintiff to file 14 an amended complaint no later than October 21, 2019, and warned Plaintiff that failure to file by 15 the deadline may result in the dismissal of the action in its entirety without further leave to amend. 16 Id. at 5. Plaintiff did not file his amended complaint, and the deadline for Plaintiff to do so has 17 long passed. Even after the Court filed an order to show cause why the case should not be 18 dismissed for failure to prosecute, Plaintiff failed to respond. See Dkt. No. 10. To date, the Court 19 has not received any further communications from Plaintiff. 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that where a…