Bonner

Bonner v. Covidien, LP.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20194:19-cv-05841California294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LORRAINE BONNER, Case No. 19-cv-05841-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

MOTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. GRANTED COVIDIEN, LP., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on October 22, 2019. Dkt. No. 13. The parties filed || a stipulation to extend the briefing schedule, which the Court granted on November 7, 2019. Dkt. || No. 20. Per the Court’s order, Plaintiff's opposition was due on November 19, 2019. Id. To date, Plaintiff has not filed her opposition. The Court may interpret a failure to oppose |} a motion as a concession that the motion should be granted. See GN Resound A/S v. Callpod, Inc., || No. C 11-04673 SBA, 2013 WL 1190651, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013) (construing plaintiffs 18 || failure to oppose defendant’s argument as a concession of said argument); see also Marziano v. || Cty of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.