Cathy

Cathy v. Kuzmicz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20194:19-cv-05932California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLES RAY CATHY, Case No. 19-cv-05932-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 4 R. KUZMICZ, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s original complaint contained many claims regarding his legal mail and retaliation. The court found that several claims were cognizable and could proceed but several allegations failed to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to either proceed only on the cognizable claims or file an amended complaint and to address the deficiencies of the remaining claims. Plaintiff has filed a motion for clarification and a motion for reconsideration that present additional information. In these motions, plaintiff seeks to present new arguments and allegations regarding the claims that were deficient. It is clear that plaintiff wishes to amend and proceed with all the claims. Therefore, the original complaint is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.