Naiman

Naiman v. Freedom Forever, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20193:19-cv-00256California2,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 9 SIDNEY NAIMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly No. C 19-00256 WHA 10 situated, 11 Plaintiff, NOTICE AND ORDER RE PUTATIVE

CLASS ACTIONS AND FACTORS

12 v. TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY

PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

FREEDOM SOLAR SERVICES, AND PROTOCOL FOR INTERVIEWING

INC; FREEDOM FOREVER, LLC; PUTATIVE CLASS MEMBERS

14 and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them, 15 Defendants. 16 17 / 18 For the settlement guidance of counsel, please review the Procedural Guidance for Class 19 Action Settlements, which is available on the website for the United States District Court for 20 the Northern District of California at www.cand.uscourts.gov/ClassActionSettlementGuidance. 21 In addition, counsel should review the following substantive and timing factors that Judge 22 William Alsup will consider in determining whether to grant preliminary and/or final approval 23 to a proposed class settlement. Many of these factors have already been set forth in In re 24 Bluetooth Headset Products Liability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.