Hanoian

Hanoian v. Santa Cruz County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20194:19-cv-00689California1,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANNY-JOHN HANOIAN, Case No. 19-cv-00689-JST

Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

11 Respondent.

12 INTRODUCTION Petitioner filed this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His petition (ECF No. 6) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. He has paid the filing fee. ECF No. 12. BACKGROUND On February 7, 2019, the Court received a notice of appeal (“NOA”) from petitioner. ECF No. 1. The NOA was on the NOA form for appealing from a judgment or order of a United States District Court to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. Id. However, in the form, petitioner stated that he was appealing an order entered on January 22, 2019 in Santa…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.