Harris
Harris v. Director of Corrections
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID D. HARRIS, Case No. 19-cv-03166-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v. Re: Dkt. No. 1 DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.
12 Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility in Stockton, California, commenced this action by filing a pro se “writ of replevin complaint.” Docket No. 1. His complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which requires the court to conduct a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. The court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id. at § 1915A(b). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). A…