Fox

Smith v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20194:19-cv-02227California3,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACY CONRAD SMITH, Case No. 19-cv-02227-PJH Petitioner,

v. ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

JARED LOZANO, CORPUS WITH PREJUDICE;

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to the order dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus with leave to amend, dkt. no. 4, represented petitioner Tracy Conrad Smith has filed an amended habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, dkt. no. 10 (“Am. Pet.”). Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254 (“Rule 4”), the amended petition is DISMISSED on the ground that it plainly appears from the amended petition and attached exhibits that petitioner is not entitled to relief. BACKGROUND As relevant to the amended petition before the court, the factual record and procedural background are summarized in the opinion of the court of appeal affirming the denial of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.