Power Integrations, Inc. v. Silanna Semiconductor North America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., Case No. 19-cv-02700-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF

v. POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

EDISON D. DE LARA, et al., MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

13 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “PI”) for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Dkt. 50 (“motion for leave”). PI seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 18, 2018 order granting Defendant The 16 Penbrothers International Inc.’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Dkt. 49 17 (“dismissal order”). 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(a), a party may file a motion for reconsideration of any 19 interlocutory order only upon obtaining leave of the Court. A party seeking reconsideration must 20 show, inter alia, (1) “[t]hat at the time of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law 21 exists from that…