Mary Gustafson v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20195:19-cv-03047California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARY GUSTAFSON,

Case No. 5:19-cv-03047-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF’S IN v. FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 11 Defendants.

On November 5, 2019, this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s first amended complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Dkt. 25. On December 3, 2019, the Ninth Circuit directed this Court to determine whether Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue during her appeal. See Gustafson v. City of San Jose, 2019 WL 5722474 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2019), appeal docketed, No. 19-17404 (9th Cir. Nov. 27, 2019). The Court may revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status if it determines the appeal is frivolous or in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.