Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20195:17-cv-04467California3,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION TO STRIKE SECOND

SUPPLEMENTAL INFRINGEMENT

SONICWALL, INC., CONTENTIONS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 164

13 In this patent infringement action, defendant SonicWall, Inc. (“SonicWall”) moves to strike plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) second supplemental infringement contentions. Dkt. No. 164. The motion was referred to the undersigned judge. Dkt. No. 75. The Court heard oral argument on the matter on October 29, 2019 and gave the parties an opportunity to file supplemental material on October 30, 2019. Dkt. Nos. 177, 179. Having considered the parties’ submissions and arguments made at the hearing, the Court grants in part and denies in part SonicWall’s motion to strike. The Court also orders Finjan to revise its infringement contentions as described…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.