Sulzberg

Sulzberg v. Happiest Minds Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20195:19-cv-05618California1,713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMI SULZBERG, Case No. 19-cv-05618-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND/OR STRIKE AND

DENYING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL

HAPPIEST MINDS TECHNOLOGIES NOTICE

PVT. LTD.,

Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant. 12 In this putative class action, Plaintiff Tami Sulzberg alleges that Defendant Happiest Minds Technologies engaged in employment discrimination on the basis of race and national origin against individuals who are not South Asian and who are not of Indian national origin. See Dkt. 1 (Complaint) at ¶¶ 1, 29. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss and/or strike, which also includes a request for judicial notice. Dkt. 8, 8-3. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 7, 15. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court deems this motion suitable for determination without oral argument. Based on a review of the parties’ submissions, the case file,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.