Paintsil Anning v. Capital One Auto Finance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARNA PAINTSIL ANNING, Case No. 19-cv-01686-KAW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Marna Paintsil Anning filed the instant case against Defendant Capital One Auto Finance, asserting violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). (See Second Amend. Compl. (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 35.) On September 12, 2019, Defendant filed the instant motion to dismiss. (Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 36.) The Court deems this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments and the applicable legal authority, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that on July 6, 2014, Plaintiff purchased a vehicle, obtaining financing from Defendant. (SAC ¶ 6.) …