Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20195:17-cv-04467California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTIONS TO SEAL

SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 191, 193, 202 Defendant.

13 In connection with two discovery disputes concerning defendant SonicWall, Inc.’s responses to plaintiff Finjan, Inc’s discovery requests (Dkt. Nos. 192, 194), the parties filed administrative motions to file exhibits associated with their joint discovery dispute letters under seal. Dkt. Nos. 191, 193, 202. Having considered those motions, the Court grants the administrative motions, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.