Randall
Hanson Crawford Crum Family Law Group, LLP v. Randall
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HANSON CRAWFORD CRUM FAMILY Case No. 18-cv-03371-VC, 19-cv-01818-
LAW GROUP, LLP, VC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS
v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JEFFREY GRAHAM RANDALL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 89 (18-cv-03371-VC) Defendant.
JEFFREY GRAHAM RANDALL,
Plaintiff, v.
HANSON CRAWFORD CRUM FAMILY
LAW GROUP, LLP,
Defendant.
The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Randall’s motion is denied. Hanson Crawford Crum’s motion is also denied, but only because the presentation by both sides does not enable the Court to decide the choice-of-law question. This is not a jury question, so it will need to be adjudicated at the pretrial conference. The parties, including Joseph Crawford himself, must appear in person at a case management conference on December 18, 2019 in Courtroom Four at 10:00 a.m. 1. Randall seeks summary judgment on Hanson Crawford Crum’s claim for breach of contract on the basis that the agreement is voidable because the parties did not comply with California Business & Professions Code section 6147. Section 6147 requires all contingency…