Randall

Hanson Crawford Crum Family Law Group, LLP v. Randall

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20193:18-cv-03371California4,958 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HANSON CRAWFORD CRUM FAMILY Case No. 18-cv-03371-VC, 19-cv-01818-

LAW GROUP, LLP, VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JEFFREY GRAHAM RANDALL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 89 (18-cv-03371-VC) Defendant.

JEFFREY GRAHAM RANDALL,

Plaintiff, v.

HANSON CRAWFORD CRUM FAMILY

LAW GROUP, LLP,

Defendant.

The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Randall’s motion is denied. Hanson Crawford Crum’s motion is also denied, but only because the presentation by both sides does not enable the Court to decide the choice-of-law question. This is not a jury question, so it will need to be adjudicated at the pretrial conference. The parties, including Joseph Crawford himself, must appear in person at a case management conference on December 18, 2019 in Courtroom Four at 10:00 a.m. 1. Randall seeks summary judgment on Hanson Crawford Crum’s claim for breach of contract on the basis that the agreement is voidable because the parties did not comply with California Business & Professions Code section 6147. Section 6147 requires all contingency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.