Frost

Frost v. Office of the United States Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20193:19-cv-05190California606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINTON FROST, Case No. 19-cv-05190-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF AND

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY, et al., APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 18, 25 12 13 Mr. Vinton Frost is a pro se plaintiff who filed a case against the Office of the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Department of Justice. See Docket No. 1. He has filed several motions for administrative relief, see Docket Nos. 18 and 25, as well as a motion requesting appointment of counsel, see Docket No. 18. First, Mr. Frost seeks the creation of a document archive to safeguard Exhibits A–F, which accompany his first motion for administrative relief. See Docket No. 18 at 4. The Court DENIES this request because any and all documents filed as part of Mr. Frost’s case (even manually filed documents such as those identified for safeguarding by Mr. Frost)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.