Heifetz

Heifetz v. Macken

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20195:19-cv-04081California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SHELBY GAIL HEIFETZ, Case No. 19-cv-04081-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

VALERIE J. MACKEN, et al.,

Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Shelby Heifetz filed the present action on July 16, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to General Order 56, plaintiff’s last day to complete service on all defendants or to file a motion for administrative relief from the service deadline was September 16, 2019. Dkt. No. 4. On October 1, 2019, Ms. Heifetz returned the executed summons indicating that she had served defendant Jose Hernandez on August 15, 2019. Dkt. No. 9. However, the docket does not indicate that Ms. Heifetz ever completed service on defendants Valerie Macken or Galdino Hernandez, or that those two defendants have waived service of summons. Additionally, pursuant to General Order 56, the parties’ last day to conduct a joint site inspection was October 29,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.