Shmuel Danan v. Outform Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20195:19-cv-02444California816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHMUEL DANAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02444-SVK

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

OUTFORM INC., Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendant.

Following the Court’s September 9, 2019 order granting Defendant Outform Inc.’s motion to dismiss the original complaint with leave to amend (Dkt. 21), Plaintiff Shmuel Danan filed a first amended complaint (Dkt. 22). Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC. Dkt. 23. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. DISCUSSION The relevant factual background and the legal standards governing motions to dismiss are discussed in the Court’s September 9, 2019 order (Dkt. 21) and are not repeated here. As discussed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.