Hyams

Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20194:18-cv-06271California4,193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN HYAMS, Case No. 18-cv-06271-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 Defendants.

13 Defendants CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, and CVS RX Services, Inc.’s (together, “CVS”) motion for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on November 13, 2019. Plaintiff Ryan Hyams appeared through his counsel, Beth Gunn. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Andrew Haeffele and Daniel Fears. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ryan Hyams was employed as a pharmacist by CVS, and this action stems from his termination from employment. The First Amended Complaint alleges eight causes of action, each against all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.