The Center for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Department of Labor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20194:19-cv-01843California4,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE Case No. 4:19-cv-01843-KAW REPORTING, et al., ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 29

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

11 Defendant. 12 On August 23, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the Government was justified in withholding documents under the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 4. On September 30, 2019, Plaintiffs, The Center for Investigative Reporting and Will Evans, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 5, 2019, the Court held a hearing, and after careful consideration of the parties’ arguments and the applicable legal authority, for the reasons set forth below, DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff the Center for Investigative Reporting (“CIR”) is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.