Russell

Russell v. Kronos Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20193:18-cv-04525California6,231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TALA RUSSELL, Case No. 18-cv-04525-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

KRONOS INCORPORATED, Docket No. 55 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Tala Russell has filed an employment discrimination case against her former employer Kronos Inc. The specific claims she has asserted are as follows: • Sex discrimination in violation of FEHA and Title VII (claims 1 and 7). • National origin discrimination in violation of FEHA and Title VII (claims 2 and 8). • Race discrimination in violation of FEHA and Title VII (claims 3 and 9).1 • Retaliation in violation of FEHA and Title VII (claims 4 and 10). • Failure to prevent discrimination and harassment in violation of FEHA (claim 5). • Wrongful discharge in violation of public policy (claim 6). Currently pending before the Court is Kronos’s motion for summary judgment. Kronos asks for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.