Hunter

Hunter v. Wells Fargo Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20193:19-cv-01531California2,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GLORIA J. HUNTER, Case No. 19-cv-01531-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

WELLS FARGO BANK, Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendant.

14 Plaintiff Gloria Hunter representing herself brings this civil action regarding loans she obtained from Defendant Wells Fargo between 1998 and 2015. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to amend. Following amendment, Wells Fargo has moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim and as barred by the statute of limitations. (Dkt. No. 34.) Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the December 19, 2019 hearing, and GRANTS the motion to dismiss. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. First Amended Complaint Allegations …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.