Racies

Racies v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20194:15-cv-00292California1,417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PHILLIP RACIES, Case No. 15-cv-00292-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTIONS TO SEAL

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 197, 203, 208 QUINCY BIOSCIENCE, LLC, Defendant.

12 The parties filed administrative motions to file documents under seal in connection with their motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 197, 203, 208. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motions to file under seal, as described below. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). “[A] strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana, 447…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.