James
James v. Uber Technologies Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20193:19-cv-06462California6,836 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS COLOPY, Case No. 19-cv-06462-EMC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
v. INJUNCTION, GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS,
AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S
Defendant. MOTION TO STRIKE
Docket Nos. 2,
13 I. INTRODUCTION Thomas Colopy (“Plaintiff”) works as a driver for Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Uber”). Plaintiff brings this putative class action alleging that Uber misclassifies its drivers as independent contractors, while California law requires that they be classified as employees. Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion to Strike. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff is Thomas Colopy, a resident of San…