Zhu

Zhu v. Ge

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20193:19-cv-08028-SICalifornia232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 XIAODAN ZHU, Case No. 19-cv-08028-SI Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 1 GARY GE, et al., Defendants.

On December 9, 2019, pro se plaintiff Xiaodan Zhu filed the above captioned action. DKt. S |] No.1. Plaintiffs complaint alleges this court has diversity jurisdiction because none of the plaintiffs 15 || live in the same state as any of the defendants and the amount of damages is more than $75,000. a || Dkt. No. 1 P 1. However, the caption of the complaint lists: (1) the plaintiff's address as 5941 || California St., San Francisco, (2) defendant Gary Ge’s address as 1992 Bowers Ave. Santa Clara, || California; and (3) defendant Yushan Duan’s phone number as a 408 area code — which is associated 19 || with San Jose, California. As such, it does not appear that this Court has diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.