Sumotext Corp. -v- Zoove, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20195:16-cv-01370California3,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 SUMOTEXT CORP., Case No. 16-cv-01370-BLF

Plaintiff,

OMNIBUS ORDER RE PARTIES’

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

ZOOVE, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 337, 339, 340, 342, 346, 347, Defendants. 349, 355, 356]

11 Before the Court are a number of administrative motions to file under seal which fall into two buckets: (1) sealing motions relating to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF 337, 355, and 356); and (2) sealing motions relating to Plaintiff’s Daubert motions regarding defense experts Greg J. Regan and Debra Aron, Ph.D. (ECF 339, 340, 342, 346, 347, and 349). The sealing motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART for the reasons discussed below. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.