Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20193:19-cv-05501California1,212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIMPLE DESIGN LTD., a British Virgin Islands ) Case No: 3:19-cv-05501-VC ) limited company, doing business as LEAP ) Hon. Judge Vince Chhabria

FITNESS )

) ORDER [PROPOSED] ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) Date: November 14, 2019 ) Time: 10:00 a.m. ) CANDYMOBI INFORMATION ) Trial Date: None set TECHNOLOGY CO., a Hong Kong company, )

BEIJING AIPU CENTURY TECHNOLOGY )

) CO., a China company, and DOES 1 through 10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Simple Design Ltd. has filed an administrative motion for leave to take limited discovery prior to a Rule 26(f) conference. (Docket No. 13.) Plaintiff seeks to obtain physical addresses and information regarding the named Defendants and to identify the Doe defendants named in the Verified Complaint (Docket No. 1), each of whom are allegedly responsible for Federal Trademark infringement, violation of the Lanham Act and unfair competition occurring as the result of their women’s health and fitness, being published via the Google Play Store at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.