State of California v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20194:18-cv-03237California1,268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03237-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY v. Re: Dkt. No. 129

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for a stay pending appeal of the Court’s November 5, 2019 Order denying EPA’s motion to alter judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5). Dkt. No. 129. As relevant for the pending motion, as of October 28, 2016, the EPA’s regulations imposed the following requirements: 1. States were required to submit implementation plans by May 30, 2017, see 40 C.F.R. § 60.23(a)(1); 2. EPA was required to approve or disapprove submitted plans by September 30, 2017, see 40 C.F.R. § 60.27(b); and 3. If either (i) states to which the guideline pertained did not submit implementation plans, or (ii) EPA disapproved a submitted plan, then EPA was required to promulgate a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.