Bindman
Bindman v. MH Sub I, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BORIS BINDMAN, Case No. 19-cv-02614-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY
ACTION
MH SUB I, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is a motion by defendant MH Sub I, LLC d/b/a Internet Brands (“Martindale”) to compel arbitration. Dkt. No. 29 (“Motion”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the December 20, 2019 hearing. Having considered the papers and for good cause shown, defendant’s motion is DENIED. Additionally, plaintiff’s objections to evidence are OVERRULED. Dkt. No. 34 at 311 (“Opp’n”). 19 BACKGROUND This lawsuit arises from Mr. Bindman’s purchase and use of Martindale’s online lead generation services for attorneys. Motion at 11; see also Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 26 (“Complaint”). Martindale owns legal websites available to…