Ashker
Ashker v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 11 TODD ASHKER, et al., Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW (RMI) Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
14 GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CALIFORNIA, et al., Judge: Honorable Robert M. Illman Defendants.
17 The Court has received Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, and the 19 Declaration of Carmen Bremer in support of the same. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(a), 20 Plaintiffs have shown that the portions of the documents to be sealed are entitled to protection under 21 the law because they contain confidential information that Defendants claim could harm CDCR 22 institutional safety and security if disclosed. See Dugan v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC, No. 12-cv- 23 02549-WHA (NJV), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51162, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2013) (finding that good 24 cause may exist to seal records “if disclosure of the…