In re: Google Location History Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20195:18-cv-05062California7,457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE GOOGLE LOCATION HISTORY

LITIGATION Case No. 5:18-cv-05062-EJD

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

10 Re: Dkt. No. 87 11

Plaintiffs Napoleon Patacsil, Richard Dixon (and his minor child L.D.), Najat Oshana, Mark Carson, Nurudaaym Mahon, and Aichi Ali bring this putative class action alleging that Defendant Google LLC violated California law by tracking and storing geolocation data via its various applications, i.e. Google Maps, Chrome, etc. Having considered the Parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on November 21, 2019, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs bring this putative class action and allege that Defendant violated California statutory, constitutional, and common law by secretly tracking and storing the geolocation and other personal data of its users. Consolidated Class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.