Neodron Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20193:19-cv-05644California845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NEODRON, LTD., Case No. 19-cv-05644-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO STAY

LENOVO GROUP, LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is a motion by defendants Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo”) and Motorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) to stay pending conclusion of a concurrent ITC investigation. Dkt. No. 26 (“Motion to Stay”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the January 10, 2020 hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion. 18 BACKGROUND In this case, plaintiff Neodron, Ltd. (“Neodron”) alleges defendants infringe seven patents: United States Patent Nos. 8,102,286; 8,451,237; 8,502,547; 8,946,574; 9,086,770; 10,088,960; and 7,821,502 (collectively, “the asserted patents”). Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 1 (“Complaint”). In concurrent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.