Drevaleva
Drevaleva v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
INTRODUCTION
17 This concerns the fourth lawsuit in a series of repetitive civil actions brought by a pro se 18 19 plaintiff against this federal defendant.* This order GRANTS his motion to dismiss.
STATEMENT
20 The three separate cases before this have arisen from the same pattern of facts. In brief, 21 pro se plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva left work at New Mexico Veterans Affairs Medical Center 22 (VAMC) without proper permission to undergo in-vitro fertilization in Russia. New Mexico 23 VAMC then fired plaintiff for being absent without leave. On June 25, 2018, plaintiff filed 24 the first of the series of lawsuits against the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and 25 26 27 * Numerous orders in plaintiff’s related lawsuits informed her that the United States Department of Veterans Affairs is an improper defendant. This order’s caption reflects the 28 correction. Robert Wilkie in the United States District Court Northern District of California. Drevaleva v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Aff. and Robert Wilkie, No. C 18-03748 WHA (N.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2018). Plaintiff has since filed two other complaints in district court against the same defendants alleging…