Menzel

Menzel v. Scholastic, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20193:17-cv-05499California12,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER MENZEL, Case No. 17-cv-05499-EMC

Plaintiff,

v. PUBLIC/REDACTED VERSION

SCHOLASTIC, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket Nos. 105, 107

15 Plaintiff Peter Menzel has sued Defendant Scholastic, Inc. for copyright infringement. Currently pending before the Court are motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment filed by both parties. Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part each party’s motion. The Court also GRANTS the various motions to file under seal that have been filed in conjunction with the summary judgment briefing. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.