Doe
Doe v. County of Sonoma
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, Case No. 16-cv-05195-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 70 COUNTY OF SONOMA et al., Defendants.
12 The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed. Pro se plaintiff John Doe’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend the federal claims alleged against the Sonoma County defendants. Dkt. No. 67. Doe timely filed an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 68. The Sonoma County defendants have moved to dismiss the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. 70. The Court found the motion suitable for a decision on the papers pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Dkt. No. 73. Dismissal is granted. The amended complaint is essentially identical to the original complaint that did not allege a cognizable federal claim against the county defendants. Doe did not add any new facts to plausibly show that the county defendants acted pursuant to a pattern, practice or policy sufficient …