Palmer v. Alameda County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20193:19-cv-03673California3,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARTY PALMER, Case No. 19-cv-03673-TSH

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION In this civil rights case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff Marty Palmer alleges the County of Alameda and its employees were deliberately indifferent to his medical condition while incarcerated at Santa Rita Jail. The Court previously dismissed Palmer’s first amended complaint with leave to amend, and the County and Sheriff Gregory Ahern (the “Moving Defendants”), now move for dismissal of his second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 24. Palmer filed an Opposition (ECF No. 26) and Moving Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 28). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.