Hardin
Hardin v. Mendocino Coast District Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELLEN HARDIN, Case No. 17-cv-05554-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO ENFORCE
MENDOCINO COAST DISTRICT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HOSPITAL, et al., Re: ECF No. 295 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Ellen Hardin’s motion to enforce settlement agreement. ECF No. 295. As discussed below, the Court concludes that the parties have an enforceable settlement agreement, but that the terms of the agreement are contrary to the position set forth in Hardin’s motion. The Court will therefore grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ellen Hardin brings this employment case, including allegations of retaliation under the federal False Claims Act, against her former employer, Mendocino Coast District Hospital (“MCDH”). She has also named the following individuals as defendants: Bob Edwards, MCDH’s chief executive…