Snarr
Snarr v. Cento Fine Foods Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEREK SNARR, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02627-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION
TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 40 CENTO FINE FOODS INC., Defendant.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, for which briefing is complete. Dkt. No. 40 (“Mot.”), 45 (“Opp.”), 51 (“Reply”). For the reasons articulated below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND On July 22, 2019, Lead Plaintiffs Derek Snarr, J. Michael Duca, and Candace Goulette filed an amended class action complaint on behalf of a putative California and nationwide class, alleging violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), and False Advertising Law (“FAL”), as well as two common law claims. Dkt. No. 39 (“FAC”). Plaintiffs’ claims are based on Defendant Cento Fine Foods, Inc.’s packaging and labeling representations regarding its “Certified San…