Purnell
Purnell v. Rudolph and Sletten Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 18-cv-01402-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN INC., Re: Dkt. No. 117 Defendant.
Defendants Rudolph and Sletten, Inc.’s (“defendant Rudolph & Sletten”) and Service West, Inc.’s (“defendant Service West”) (collectively, “defendants”) motion for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on September 25, 2019. Pro se plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell (“plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the motion but failed to appear at the hearing. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Mark Divelbiss and Kristin Hutchins. At the court’s request, defendants filed supplemental briefing concerning plaintiff’s employment discrimination claims on October 22, 2019 (Dkt. 152), which plaintiff subsequently responded to on November 12, 2019 (Dkt. 159). Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their argument, proffered …