Hubbard

Hubbard v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 24, 20194:19-cv-07508California1,666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZANE M. HUBBARD, Case No. 19-cv-07508-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

GLORIA RAMOS, Defendant.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against SVSP psychiatrist Gloria Ramos. His complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.